Men Need a Realistic Perspective About Life Without a Prostate

Men Need a Realistic Perspective About Life Without a Prostate
Living & Loving with Prostate Cancer In 2001, the way prostate cancer was treated was revolutionized by the introduction of the da Vinci surgical robot. Men with prostate cancer faced a new dilemma. The robotic procedure was heavily marketed by hospitals and treatment centers with unsubstantiated claims and benefits. According to a 2011 study by Johns Hopkins Medicine, as many as four in 10 hospital websites were making unsubstantiated claims about the benefits of robotic surgery. The two prominent quality-of-life issues associated with living without a prostate are the loss of urinary control and the loss of erectile function. When you read or hear that success rates in these two areas are in the 90% range, it's highly probable you're reading hype. The study found that 164 of 400 hospital robot-surgery websites surveyed “overestimate the benefits o
Subscribe or to access all post and page content.


  1. Michael Boring says:

    The statistics lie. Therefore DR lie because they quote statistics. I am a Patient Advocate and speak to men’s health groups several times a year about my recovery and our success with the implants. Men who regain 50% or more sexual function after a prostatectomy are the exception. Those like you and me who regain 0 are the norm. Thanks getting the message out. Let me know if I can help in any way


  2. Don says:

    I’m a recent prostatectomy patient and all of the options including implant surgery were discussed with me by my surgeon. He didn’t sugar coat things. He indicated a real possibility of being impotent after the 1-2 year window. I don’t feel he gave me false hope but some of the treatments post-op I.e. low dose Cialis is a hope providing option. Now it’s a wait and see.No one can predict how the body will react to such invasive measures. I feel they do all they can to save our lives….the rest is left to time, healing and other biological factors.

  3. Lawrence Glickman says:

    Read the following book for a comprehensive discussion of less invasive prostate cancer treatment options. With better potency profiles. I found it hugely helpful and accurate.

    “AN ABC OF PROSTATE CANCER TODAY Second Edition My Journey over 4 Continents to Find the Best Cure” Alan G. Lawrenson An ABC of Prostate Cancer Today (Kindle Locations 24-31). Alan G Lawrenson. Kindle Edition.

  4. Randell Young says:

    Q: Now that both the 5-year and 10-year clinical data are in on CyberKnife, why would anyone choose to undergo a prostatectomy?

    A: They trust their doctor (who is more interesting in reimbursement than patient outcome) and they fail to do even a modicum of research on their own…

    • Lawrence Glickman says:

      Randell cyberknife has some very impressive cure rates and when my time comes it will be near the top of my list. There is one issue and that the recent statistics show a 40% potency issue depending on the case etc. If one has only a couple of well defined lesions and a PSA below 6 and potency is a major concern etc I might go with the new TOOCAD system developed in Israel and it just did well in tests at Sloan Kettering. Currently available in Mexico or Israel but soon generally or with HIFU (High Frequency Ultrasound) or focal Cryo with Doctor Duke Bahn in Ventura CA. Each case is different but less radiation is a good thing. I would go with CyberKnife rather than surgery.

  5. Jeff says:

    For what it’s worth…
    My experience is that my urology doc didn’t sugarcoat the potential outcomes, and conversations with numerous survivors and holistic practitioners suggested to me anecdotally that I might try self stimulation as soon and as often as I felt I was up to it, that promoting more frequent blood flow might actually promote more healing.
    I had da Vinci surgery 3 1/2 years ago, and within one year I had regained 50% erections and by two years 80%, where I remain today. I am 70 years old now, and have regained most of my sexual potency—enough to have what seems to be a normal level of sexual activity for a man of my age. I credit my doc’s skill, a positive attitude, and maybe—just maybe—my personal effort to promote a return to mostly normal activity.

  6. Darryl Baillie says:

    I was told my my Urologist that all of his patients have erections after the Da Vinci robotic surgery, then he added – every so often about one in 200 men might not. He claimed that the outcome was about 70% of pre-surgery level. HE LIED! that was 7 yrs ago.
    I to am a patient advocate and I tell my guys the figures in Australia are that 77% will have no function at 2 yrs and that figure was from Dr Norman Swan and he went on national television to say it. Yet none of the liars (Urologists) will go on national television to speak to their claims… I wonder why??
    They should be prosecuted for false and misleading advertising!!

  7. Bill says:

    I was lied to.Or in the least misinformed by uninformed Drs.I was told all function would be back in a year.5 years later after the davinchi procedure im worse off than I was before surgery.I should have let it run its course or tried radiation and enjoyed my last few years as my pristate was 75% involved with cancer.

  8. Christopher Brown says:

    I’m not a patient, but I have had a close family member recently diagnosed. I am disturbed to hear so many men complain they are still alive and free of cancer. Or am I missing something here?

  9. Lawrence Glickman says:

    I am disgusted at the slow pace of the FDA to approve the TOOKAD system and other less invasive procedures. It seems to me that the FDA and the AMA are conspiring to maintain the high priced surgery and radiation treatments. Sloan Ketering already said TOOKAD looks fine and Mexico and Europe have approved it. In addition outside of Dr.Sperling in Florida most Docotors have no idea that laser treatment is available. Next why is it hard to get insurance coverage for less invasive procedures? Something is rotten at the FDA and AMA, Finally that are clinical studies showing various natural supplements that may slow down or stop the advance of PSA such as boron. Why is it that few Doctors know anything about the role of diet and supplements? Again not enough money in it?

  10. Jim says:

    The BIG lie, “Prostate cancer screening and early detection saves men’s lives”. Let’s do the math: Per the USPSTF (a US government health agency): “A small benefit and known harms from prostate cancer screening” and “Only one man in 1,000 could possibly have a life saving benefit from screening”. However about 1.3 to 3.5 deaths per 1,000 from prostate blind biopsies. Also 5 men in 1000 died and 20.4% had one or more complications within 30 days of a prostatectomy. This does not include deaths and injuries from other procedures, medical mistakes, increased suicide rate, ADT therapy complications, heart attracts, etc, caused by screening and treatments. Does prostate cancer screening put men’s health and lives in danger? YES! Early detection and treatment has killed or destroyed millions of men’s lives worldwide from understated or undisclosed side effects. The man that invented the PSA test, Dr. Richard Ablin now calls it: The Great Prostate Mistake, Hoax and A Profit Driven Public Health Disaster.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *